Archive for the ‘Europe’ Category

Trademark holders may buy new domain names

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Nominet, the UK domain name registry, is planning to introduce two letter and one character domain names (e.g. ‘ba’, ‘0’, etc.). This type of domain name has previously been banned from use in relation to ‘.uk’ domain names because of a technical issue. As this issue no longer applies (except in relation to ‘com’, ‘net’ and ‘org’), around 2,000 new domain names can be released into the public domain.

The domains would be made available first to parties with a registered trademark identical to the domain name in question, and then to the general public. Where there are two or more parties with a pre-existing trademark registration that would entitle them to use the domain name, a number of proposals have been considered. For example, one possible solution could be to use a sealed bid auction for domains where there are two or more interested parties of the same business type. (more…)

Trademark registration consultation paper

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

The UK Intellectual Property Office has published a consultation paper seeking views on proposed changes to the Trade Mark Rules 2008.  It is concerned that two of the procedures currently provided for by the Trade Mark Rules are no longer in tune with the needs of business.

This is mainly due to the fact that the procedures, which have been available for some time, have had a fairly limited uptake. Bearing in mind that the Intellectual Property Office is in the process of upgrading its information technology infrastructure, it would be possible to obtain cost savings whilst doing so if the facility to carry out these procedures does not have to be built-in. It is hoped that the responses to the consultation paper will aid the Intellectual Property Office in deciding whether or not to remove these facilities. (more…)

Descriptive Community Trade Mark

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC v OHIM (2010) Case C-408/08 P

This was a final appeal before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ). The Appellant sought to overturn a decision by OHIM (the EU body responsible for the administration of trade marks) to revoke its Community Trade Mark registration for COLOR EDITION in respect of Class 3 (cosmetic and make-up preparations). The revocation was based on the following provision of EU law, which prohibits the registration of:

‘… trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or service.’

The trade mark COLOR EDITION had been found to be exclusively composed of words describing the characteristics of the goods for sale. Without more, such a device cannot function as a trade mark (an indicator of the business responsible for the good or service in question). (more…)

‘MY IP’ – Intellectual property explained

Monday, March 1st, 2010

The UK Intellectual Property Office has produced an easy to digest introduction to patents, designs, trade marks, copyright and designs.

It provides an explanation of the economic importance of intellectual property and the ways in which it can be exploited for a profit, or used to protect the position of a business in the marketplace.

The trademark section includes a basic overview of the purposes underlying this right and outlines the registration process. The ‘At a Glance’ feature allows easy comparison with the protection afforded by other intellectual property rights.

A feature that may be of particular interest to individuals or owners of a Small or Medium sized business is the ‘IP Healthcheck.’ This can be accessed at no cost online and allows you to identify the aspects of your business which may require protection through intellectual property. (more…)

Community Trade Mark infringement in the UK

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 110

This hearing took place in the UK Court of Appeal.

The Appellant was seeking to overturn a finding that it had infringed the UK and Community Trade Mark rights of the Respondent in the word CIPRIANI, and was guilty of passing-off in respect of the same name.

The word was registered in respect of goods and services including hotels, restaurants, bars and catering. It was obtained by the Respondent after it had purchased a hotel business of international reputation in Italy.

The Appellant was run by a member of the Cipriani family in Italy that had originally sold the hotel business to the Respondent. It operated a restaurant in London under the names CIPRIANI LONDON and CIPRIANI. (more…)

Trademark infringement and sponsored links

Monday, January 25th, 2010

One of the biggest sources of controversy in trademark law at the moment is the use of keywords in Internet advertising. In the last few years, many court cases have been commenced around the world as outraged trademark owners seek to put a stop to what they see as an invisible form of trademark infringement.

The controversy surrounding advertising keywords and registered trademarks

Keyword advertising is most commonly used by search engines to supplement ‘natural’ search results. The way it works is simple. Advertisers pay a fee for their link to appear on the results page when a user searches for certain phrases. So for example, a retailer that sells a popular brand of flowers in their store might like to use the brand of flowers as a trigger for their adverts. This would allow them to inform consumers that the particular brand of flowers is available in-store.

There is currently nothing in the infrastructure of the sponsored links services that search engines offer to stop advertisers selecting trademarks and brand names to act as those triggers, and here lies the problem. A trader could theoretically use a competitor’s more reputable trademark to divert consumers towards their own website, by buying the competitor’s brand as a trigger keyword. Naturally, the trademark owners are less than happy about this, seeing it as an unfair use of their carefully developed goodwill. There is not yet a straightforward legal answer to the question of whether such use is indeed unfair (though there may be soon, at least in Europe). (more…)

Community Trade Marks

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

Introducing the Community Trade Mark

The Community Trade Mark (CTM) allows an applicant to register a trademark valid in every Member State of the European Union with a single application. It was introduced as part of the harmonisation of the Internal Market in the European Union, the same project that gave rise to the Euro, as well as many other significant developments in economic regulation law.

It prevents the single economic market of the European Union being disrupted by businesses registering national trade marks in each Member State; such a situation could allow the trade mark holder to stop goods that they have released for sale in one EU country being later resold in another (so called ‘parallel imports’). The motivation for doing this would be to facilitate the marketing of goods to each country at a different price (in some countries, it is cheaper to bring a product to market, making it possible to sell the goods on for less), without worrying that the price would be undercut by third parties importing the goods from a different EU country. (more…)